Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://superindex.lbr.auckland.ac.nz/handle/123456789/67280
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.coverage.spatialAuckland, N.Z.en
dc.creatorAnderson, Danae-
dc.date2014en
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-18T21:00:47Z-
dc.date.available2014-11-18T21:00:47Z-
dc.date.issued2014-11-19-
dc.identifier.issn1176-4716en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/67280-
dc.description.abstractUsing Sargeant and Tucker's 2009 framework, this study investigated the following questions; (a) What are the existing protections for New Zealand's vulnerable workers? (b) why is the framework ineffective? (c) what can be done to improve the protection of such vulnerable workers?en
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.relation.ispartofNew Zealand Journal of Employment Relationsen
dc.relation.urihttp://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=676461205163558;res=IELBUSen
dc.subjectNew Zealanden
dc.subjectImmigrantsen
dc.subjectLabouren
dc.subjectHuman rightsen
dc.titleAre vulnerable workers really protected in New Zealand?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
prism.volume39en
prism.number1en
prism.startingpage52 - 67en
dc.date.published2014-10-
Appears in Collections:New Zealand Asia Information Service

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.